The IT Law Wiki
Don't have an account?
Register
Register
in: Case, Case-U.S.-Federal, Case-U.S.-Contract, Contract

Changes: Apple v. San Francisco Canyon

Back to page
Edit
(New page: Citation: Apple Computer, Inc. v. San Francisco Canyon Co. [citation needed] == Factual Background == San Francisco Canyon Co. was a software developer that contracted with Apple Co...)
 
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
== Citation ==
⚫
Citation: Apple Computer, Inc. v. San Francisco Canyon Co. [citation needed]
  
   
  ⚫
'''Apple Computer, Inc. v. San Francisco Canyon Co.''' (filed Dec. 6, 1994).
   
 
== Factual Background ==
  
== Factual Background ==
Line 12: Line 13:
 
The lawsuit, filed on December 6, 1994, alleged that the San Francisco Canyon used some of the [[code]] developed under [[contract]] to Apple, in their additions to Video for Windows. Apple expanded the lawsuit to include Intel and Microsoft on February 10, 1995, alleging that Microsoft and Intel knowingly used the software company to aid them in stealing several thousand lines of Apple's QuickTime [[code]] in their effort to improve the performance of Video for Windows.
 
The lawsuit, filed on December 6, 1994, alleged that the San Francisco Canyon used some of the [[code]] developed under [[contract]] to Apple, in their additions to Video for Windows. Apple expanded the lawsuit to include Intel and Microsoft on February 10, 1995, alleging that Microsoft and Intel knowingly used the software company to aid them in stealing several thousand lines of Apple's QuickTime [[code]] in their effort to improve the performance of Video for Windows.
   
−
On March 3, 1995, a Federal judge issued a [[temporary restraining order]] that prohibited Microsoft from distributing its current version of Video for Windows. <ref>[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE0DF153AF930A35750C0A963958260 Court Order on Microsoft], New York Times, March 3, 1995.</ref> Microsoft subsequently released version 1.1e of Video for Windows, that removed all of the [[code]] contributed by San Francisco Canyon, stating in the release notes "does not include the low-level driver [[code]] that was [[license]]d from Intel Corporation." Later testimony in the [[Microsoft anti-trust trial]] revealed that, at the time, Apple was threatening Microsoft with a multi-billion dollar lawsuit over the allegedly stolen [[code]], and in return Bill Gates was threatening with the cancellation of Office for the Mac.<ref>Graham Lea, [http://www.theregister.co.uk/1999/02/01/maritz_on_apple/ "Maritz on . . . Apple"], The Register, Feb. 1, 1999; Rachel, Chalmers, [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0CGN/is_1999_Jan_26/ai_53999515 "Apple And Microsoft: Jobs Barefoot Under A Tree"], Computergram Int'l, Jan. 26, 1999.</ref>
+
On March 3, 1995, a federal judge issued a [[temporary restraining order]] that prohibited Microsoft from [[distribution|distributing]] its current version of Video for Windows.<ref>[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE0DF153AF930A35750C0A963958260 Court Order on Microsoft], New York Times, March 3, 1995.</ref> Microsoft subsequently released version 1.1e of Video for Windows, that removed all of the [[code]] contributed by San Francisco Canyon, stating in the release notes "does not include the low-level driver [[code]] that was [[license]]d from Intel Corporation." Later testimony in the [[Microsoft anti-trust trial]] revealed that, at the time, Apple was threatening Microsoft with a multi-billion dollar lawsuit over the allegedly stolen [[code]], and in return Bill Gates was threatening with the cancellation of Office for the Mac.<ref>Graham Lea, [http://www.theregister.co.uk/1999/02/01/maritz_on_apple/ "Maritz on . . . Apple"], The Register, Feb. 1, 1999; Rachel, Chalmers, [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0CGN/is_1999_Jan_26/ai_53999515 "Apple And Microsoft: Jobs Barefoot Under A Tree"], Computergram Int'l, Jan. 26, 1999.</ref>
   
−
In August 1997, Apple and Microsoft announced a settlement deal. Apple would drop all current lawsuits, including all lingering issues from the ''[[Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.]]'' lawsuit and the "QuickTime [[source code]]" lawsuit, and agree to make [[Internet Explorer]] the default [[browser]] on the Macintosh unless the user explicitly chose the [[bundle]]d [[Netscape browser]]. In return, Microsoft agreed to continue developing Office, [[Internet Explorer]], and various [[developer tool]]s and [[developer software|software]] for the Mac for the next five years, and purchase $150 million of non-voting Apple stock.
 +
In August 1997, Apple and Microsoft announced a settlement deal. Apple would drop all current lawsuits, including all lingering issues from the ''[[Apple v. Microsoft|Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.]]'' lawsuit and the "QuickTime [[source code]]" lawsuit, and agree to make [[Internet Explorer]] the default [[browser]] on the Macintosh unless the user explicitly chose the [[bundle]]d [[Netscape browser]]. In return, Microsoft agreed to continue developing Office, [[Internet Explorer]], and various [[developer tool]]s and [[developer software|software]] for the Mac for the next five years, and purchase $150 million of non-voting Apple stock.
   
−
The companies also agreed to mutual collaboration on Java technologies, and to [[cross-license]] all existing [[patent]]s, and [[patent]]s obtained during the five-year deal, with one another. <ref>Dawn Kawamoto, Ben Heskett, & Mike Ricciuti [http://news.com.com/MS+to+invest+150+million+in+Apple/2100-1001_3-202143.html "MS to invest $150 million in Apple"], CNET News, Aug. 6, 1997; [http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,5156-page,1/article.html "Microsoft to Invest in Apple; Jobs, Ellison on Board"], PC World, Aug. 6, 1997; [http://contracts.corporate.findlaw.com/agreements/apple/microsoft.1997.08.05.html "Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement"], FindLaw, Aug. 5, 1997</ref>
 +
The companies also agreed to mutual collaboration on Java technologies, and to [[cross-license]] all existing [[patent]]s, and [[patent]]s obtained during the five-year deal, with one another. <ref>Dawn Kawamoto, Ben Heskett, & Mike Ricciuti [http://archive.is/20120530223706/news.com.com/MS+to+invest+150+million+in+Apple/2100-1001_3-202143.html "MS to invest $150 million in Apple"], CNET News, Aug. 6, 1997; [http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,5156-page,1/article.html "Microsoft to Invest in Apple; Jobs, Ellison on Board"], PC World, Aug. 6, 1997; [http://contracts.corporate.findlaw.com/agreements/apple/microsoft.1997.08.05.html "Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement"], FindLaw, Aug. 5, 1997</ref>
   
 
== References ==
  
== References ==
 
<references/>
  
<references/>
   
−
== External links ==
 +
== External resources ==
   
 
* [http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F60611FB3D550C738DDDAB0894DD494D81 John Markoff, "Intel and Microsoft Added to Apple Lawsuit"], New York Times,'' Feb. 10, 1995.
  
* [http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F60611FB3D550C738DDDAB0894DD494D81 John Markoff, "Intel and Microsoft Added to Apple Lawsuit"], New York Times,'' Feb. 10, 1995.
Line 28: Line 29:
 
* [http://web.archive.org/web/20001012140945/http://www.pa.msu.edu/~hamlin/facts/2ndltr.html Second open letter from Apple] - follow-up letter from Apple Director Michael Mace regarding the issue.
  
* [http://web.archive.org/web/20001012140945/http://www.pa.msu.edu/~hamlin/facts/2ndltr.html Second open letter from Apple] - follow-up letter from Apple Director Michael Mace regarding the issue.
 
* [http://www.mackido.com/History/History_VfW.html "Have you ever heard of VfW (Video for Windows)?"], ''MacKiDo'', May 6, 1997.
  
* [http://www.mackido.com/History/History_VfW.html "Have you ever heard of VfW (Video for Windows)?"], ''MacKiDo'', May 6, 1997.
−
* [http://www.roughlydrafted.com/insideitunes2.html "Inside iTunes: Part II: The QuickTime Media Layer: Apple's Best Kept Secret"] at ''RoughlyDrafted'', Feb. 2, 2004.
 +
* [http://www.roughlydrafted.com/insideitunes2.html "Inside iTunes: Part II: The QuickTime Media Layer: Apple's Best Kept Secret"], ''RoughlyDrafted'', Feb. 2, 2004.
  +
  +
   
 
{{Wikipedia|San Francisco Canyon Company}}
  
{{Wikipedia|San Francisco Canyon Company}}
  +
[[Category:Case]]
  +
[[Category:Case-U.S.-Federal]]
  +
[[Category:Case-U.S.-Contract]]
  +
[[Category:Contract]]

Latest revision as of 16:03, 9 November 2013

Citation[]

Apple Computer, Inc. v. San Francisco Canyon Co. (filed Dec. 6, 1994).

Factual Background[]

San Francisco Canyon Co. was a software developer that contracted with Apple Computer in 1992 to port the QuickTime technology to Microsoft Windows. They made their first release of QuickTime for Windows in November 1992.

In July 1993, Intel contracted San Francisco Canyon Co. to improve the performance of Microsoft's Video for Windows technology on Intel processors. By the end of 1993, Intel and Microsoft had combined their efforts to improve Video for Windows by creating a joint technology called Display Control Interface, that was included in version 1.1d of Video for Windows.

Trial Court Proceedings[]

The lawsuit, filed on December 6, 1994, alleged that the San Francisco Canyon used some of the code developed under contract to Apple, in their additions to Video for Windows. Apple expanded the lawsuit to include Intel and Microsoft on February 10, 1995, alleging that Microsoft and Intel knowingly used the software company to aid them in stealing several thousand lines of Apple's QuickTime code in their effort to improve the performance of Video for Windows.

On March 3, 1995, a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order that prohibited Microsoft from distributing its current version of Video for Windows.[1] Microsoft subsequently released version 1.1e of Video for Windows, that removed all of the code contributed by San Francisco Canyon, stating in the release notes "does not include the low-level driver code that was licensed from Intel Corporation." Later testimony in the Microsoft anti-trust trial revealed that, at the time, Apple was threatening Microsoft with a multi-billion dollar lawsuit over the allegedly stolen code, and in return Bill Gates was threatening with the cancellation of Office for the Mac.[2]

In August 1997, Apple and Microsoft announced a settlement deal. Apple would drop all current lawsuits, including all lingering issues from the Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. lawsuit and the "QuickTime source code" lawsuit, and agree to make Internet Explorer the default browser on the Macintosh unless the user explicitly chose the bundled Netscape browser. In return, Microsoft agreed to continue developing Office, Internet Explorer, and various developer tools and software for the Mac for the next five years, and purchase $150 million of non-voting Apple stock.

The companies also agreed to mutual collaboration on Java technologies, and to cross-license all existing patents, and patents obtained during the five-year deal, with one another. [3]

References[]

  1. ↑ Court Order on Microsoft, New York Times, March 3, 1995.
  2. ↑ Graham Lea, "Maritz on . . . Apple", The Register, Feb. 1, 1999; Rachel, Chalmers, "Apple And Microsoft: Jobs Barefoot Under A Tree", Computergram Int'l, Jan. 26, 1999.
  3. ↑ Dawn Kawamoto, Ben Heskett, & Mike Ricciuti "MS to invest $150 million in Apple", CNET News, Aug. 6, 1997; "Microsoft to Invest in Apple; Jobs, Ellison on Board", PC World, Aug. 6, 1997; "Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement", FindLaw, Aug. 5, 1997

External resources[]


This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors). Smallwikipedialogo.png
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.