The IT Law Wiki
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
== Definition ==
{{stub}}
 
 
   
 
'''Arbitration''' is a non-judicial, [[dispute resolution]] procedure. Generally, there is a hearing with testimony from witnesses before one or more [[arbitrator]]s. At the end of the hearing, the [[arbitrator]](s) issue an award, which is final and [[binding]] regarding all matter submitted to them.
 
'''Arbitration''' is a non-judicial, [[dispute resolution]] procedure. Generally, there is a hearing with testimony from witnesses before one or more [[arbitrator]]s. At the end of the hearing, the [[arbitrator]](s) issue an award, which is final and [[binding]] regarding all matter submitted to them.
   
  +
== Overview ==
"It is beyond cavil that arbitration is a matter of contract and a party cannot be required to submit to arbitration any dispute which he has not agreed so to submit."<ref>Ajida Tech., Inc. v. Roos Instruments, Inc., 87 Cal.App.4th 534, 541, 104 Cal.Rptr.2d 686 (2001) (citations and internal quotation omitted).</ref>
 
  +
 
{{Quote|It is beyond cavil that arbitration is a matter of contract and a party cannot be required to submit to arbitration any dispute which he has not agreed so to submit.<ref>Ajida Tech., Inc. v. Roos Instruments, Inc., 87 Cal.App.4th 534, 541, 104 Cal.Rptr.2d 686 (2001) ([http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17338398277337949918&q=87+Cal.App.4th+534&hl=en&as_sdt=2002 full-text]) (citations and internal quotation omitted).</ref>}}
   
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
Line 14: Line 15:
 
[[Category:Business]]
 
[[Category:Business]]
 
[[Category:Arbitration]]
 
[[Category:Arbitration]]
  +
[[Category:Definition]]

Latest revision as of 17:41, 19 June 2012

Definition[]

Arbitration is a non-judicial, dispute resolution procedure. Generally, there is a hearing with testimony from witnesses before one or more arbitrators. At the end of the hearing, the arbitrator(s) issue an award, which is final and binding regarding all matter submitted to them.

Overview[]

It is beyond cavil that arbitration is a matter of contract and a party cannot be required to submit to arbitration any dispute which he has not agreed so to submit.[1]

References[]

  1. Ajida Tech., Inc. v. Roos Instruments, Inc., 87 Cal.App.4th 534, 541, 104 Cal.Rptr.2d 686 (2001) (full-text) (citations and internal quotation omitted).

See also[]