Citation[edit | edit source]
Factual Background[edit | edit source]
The Federal Trade Commission alleged that the defendants orchestrated a scheme whereby consumers seeking online entertainment were disconnected from their regular ISPs and reconnected to a Madagascar phone number. The consumers were then charged between $3.99 and $7.78 per minute for the duration of each connection. In that case, AT&T and Sprint — which were not parties to the FTC enforcement action — had carried the calls connecting the consumers’ computers to the defendants’ servers. Consumers were billed at AT&T’s and Sprint’s filed rates for calls to Madagascar.
Court Proceedings[edit | edit source]
The defendants therefore argued that the entertainment service in question was provided on a common carrier basis and thus outside the FTC’s jurisdiction. One defendant also claimed to be a common carrier itself and hence beyond FTC jurisdiction. Both the District Court and the Court of Appeals rejected those arguments.