mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{Quote|We must be acutely aware of excessive rigidity when applying the law in the Internet context; emerging technologies require a flexible approach.}} |
+ | {{Quote|We must be acutely aware of excessive rigidity when applying the law in the Internet context; emerging technologies require a flexible approach.<ref>[[Brookfield Communications v. West Coast Entertainment]], at 1054.</ref>}} |
− | |||
− | ::::::::[[Brookfield Communications v. West Coast Entertainment]], at 1054. |
||
== Definition == |
== Definition == |
||
'''Internet law''' generally refers to those legal doctrines that have been impacted by the growth of the [[Internet]]. This area of law is a subset of [[information technology law]]. |
'''Internet law''' generally refers to those legal doctrines that have been impacted by the growth of the [[Internet]]. This area of law is a subset of [[information technology law]]. |
||
+ | |||
+ | == References == |
||
+ | <references /> |
||
== See also == |
== See also == |
Latest revision as of 04:39, 20 May 2018
“ | We must be acutely aware of excessive rigidity when applying the law in the Internet context; emerging technologies require a flexible approach.[1] | ” |
Definition[]
Internet law generally refers to those legal doctrines that have been impacted by the growth of the Internet. This area of law is a subset of information technology law.