The IT Law Wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
 
The '''nominative fair use''' defense “acknowledges that ‘it is often virtually impossible to refer to a particular product for purposes of comparison, criticism, point of reference or any other such purpose without using the [[trademark|mark]].”<ref>Brother Records, Inc. v. Jardine, 318 F.3d 900, 908 (9th Cir. 2003) (citation omitted).</ref>
 
The '''nominative fair use''' defense “acknowledges that ‘it is often virtually impossible to refer to a particular product for purposes of comparison, criticism, point of reference or any other such purpose without using the [[trademark|mark]].”<ref>Brother Records, Inc. v. Jardine, 318 F.3d 900, 908 (9th Cir. 2003) (citation omitted).</ref>
   
“The court looks at three factors in determining whether a defendant is entitled to the nominative fair use defense (1) the product must not be readily identifiable without use of the [[trademark|mark]]; (2) only so much of the [[trademark|mark]] may be used as is reasonably necessary to identify the product; and (3) the user must do nothing that would, in conjunction with the [[trademark|mark]], suggest [[sponsorship]] or [[endorsement]] by the [[trademark holder]].<ref>Horphag Res. Ltd. v. Pelligrini, 337 F.3d 1036, 1041 (9th Cir. 2003).</ref>
+
:The court looks at three factors in determining whether a defendant is entitled to the nominative fair use defense (1) the product must not be readily identifiable without use of the [[trademark|mark]]; (2) only so much of the [[trademark|mark]] may be used as is reasonably necessary to identify the product; and (3) the user must do nothing that would, in conjunction with the [[trademark|mark]], suggest [[sponsorship]] or [[endorsement]] by the [[trademark holder]].<ref>Horphag Res. Ltd. v. Pelligrini, 337 F.3d 1036, 1041 (9th Cir. 2003).</ref>
   
 
== References ==
 
== References ==

Revision as of 06:09, 18 January 2009


The nominative fair use defense “acknowledges that ‘it is often virtually impossible to refer to a particular product for purposes of comparison, criticism, point of reference or any other such purpose without using the mark.”[1]

The court looks at three factors in determining whether a defendant is entitled to the nominative fair use defense (1) the product must not be readily identifiable without use of the mark; (2) only so much of the mark may be used as is reasonably necessary to identify the product; and (3) the user must do nothing that would, in conjunction with the mark, suggest sponsorship or endorsement by the trademark holder.[2]

References

  1. Brother Records, Inc. v. Jardine, 318 F.3d 900, 908 (9th Cir. 2003) (citation omitted).
  2. Horphag Res. Ltd. v. Pelligrini, 337 F.3d 1036, 1041 (9th Cir. 2003).