The IT Law Wiki
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
== Definition ==
The fundamental right to '''reproduce''' [[copyrighted works]] in [[copies]] and [[phonorecords]]<ref>[http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/101.html 17 U.S.C. §101].</ref> is implicated in innumerable [[online]] transactions. Indeed, because of the nature of computer-to-computer communications, reproduction is implicated in most [[online]] transactions. For example, when a [[computer user]] accesses a document resident on another [[computer]], the image on the user's screen exists only by virtue of the [[copy]] that is reproduced in the user's [[computer memory]]. It has long been clear under U.S. law that the placement of [[copyrighted material]] into a [[computer]]'s [[memory]] is a reproduction of that material (because the work in [[memory]] then may be, in the law's terms, "perceived, reproduced, or . . . communicated . . . with the aid of a machine or device").<ref>In 1978, the [[CONTU Final Report]] noted, "[T]he application of principles already embodied in the language of the [current] [[copyright law]] achieves the desired substantive legal protection for [[copyrighted works]] which exist in [[machine-readable form]]. The introduction of a [[work]] into a [[computer memory]] would, consistent with the [current] law, be a reproduction of the [[work]], one of the [[exclusive rights]] of the [[copyright owner|copyright proprietor]]." [[CONTU Final Report]], at 40. ''See also'' [[MAI v. Peak|MAI Sys. Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc.,]] 991 F.2d 511, 519 (9th Cir. 1993), ''cert. dism.,'' 510 U.S. 1033 (1994).; [[Vault v. Quaid|Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd.,]] 847 F.2d 255, 260 (5th Cir. 1988); [[Advanced Computer Services v. MAI|Advanced Computer Servs. v. MAI Sys. Corp.]], 845 F. Supp. 356 (E.D. Va. 1994); [[Triad v. Southeastern Express|Triad Sys. Corp. v. Southeastern Express Co.]], 64 F.3d 1330 (9th Cir. 1995).</ref>
 
   
  +
To '''reproduce''' (also '''duplicate''') means to make a [[copy]].
The [[1976 Copyright Act]], its legislative history, the [[CONTU Final Report]], and repeated holdings by courts make it clear that in each of the instances set out below, one or more [[copies]] is made.<ref>That [[copying]] has occurred does not necessarily mean that [[copyright infringement|infringement]] has occurred. When [[copying]] is (1) authorized by the copyright owner, (2) exempt from liability as a fair use, (3) otherwise exempt under the provisions of Sections 108-19 or Chapter 10 of the Copyright Act, or (4) of such a small amount as to be [[de minimis]], then there is no [[copyright infringement|infringement]] liability.</ref>
 
  +
  +
== U.S. copyright law ==
  +
 
The fundamental right to reproduce [[copyrighted works]] in [[copies]] and [[phonorecords]]<ref>[http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/101.html 17 U.S.C. §101].</ref> is implicated in innumerable [[online]] transactions. Indeed, because of the nature of [[computer-to-computer communications]], reproduction is implicated in most [[online transaction]]s. For example, when a [[computer user]] [[access]]es a [[document]] resident on another [[computer]], the [[image]] on the [[user]]'s [[screen]] exists only by virtue of the [[copy]] that is reproduced in the [[user]]'s [[computer memory]]. It has long been clear under U.S. law that the placement of [[copyrighted material]] into a [[computer]]'s [[memory]] is a reproduction of that material (because the work in [[memory]] then may be, in the law's terms, "perceived, reproduced, or . . . communicated . . . with the aid of a machine or device").<ref>In 1978, the [[CONTU Final Report]] noted, "[T]he application of principles already embodied in the language of the [current] [[copyright law]] achieves the desired substantive legal protection for [[copyrighted works]] which exist in [[machine-readable]] form. The introduction of a [[work]] into a [[computer memory]] would, consistent with the [current] law, be a reproduction of the [[work]], one of the [[exclusive rights]] of the [[copyright owner|copyright proprietor]]." [[CONTU Final Report]], at 40. ''See also'' [[MAI v. Peak|MAI Sys. Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc.]], 991 F.2d 511, 519 (9th Cir. 1993) ([http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar_case?case=5882317517996842407&q=991+F.2d+511&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5 full-text]), ''cert. dism.,'' 510 U.S. 1033 (1994).; [[Vault v. Quaid|Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd.]], 847 F.2d 255, 260 (5th Cir. 1988) ([http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar_case?case=16019243729477191973&q=847+F.2d+255&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5 full-text]); [[Advanced Computer Services v. MAI|Advanced Computer Servs. v. MAI Sys. Corp.]], 845 F. Supp. 356 (E.D. Va. 1994) ([http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar_case?case=4158209661460665908&q=845+F.+Supp.+356&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5 full-text]); [[Triad v. Southeastern Express|Triad Sys. Corp. v. Southeastern Express Co.]], 64 F.3d 1330 (9th Cir. 1995) ([http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar_case?case=8884620556042209426&q=+64+F.3d+1330&hl=en&as_sdt=2,5 full-text]).</ref>
  +
 
The [[1976 Copyright Act]], its legislative history, the [[CONTU Final Report]], and repeated holdings by courts make it clear that in each of the instances set out below, one or more [[copies]] is made.<ref>That [[copying]] has occurred does not necessarily mean that [[copyright infringement|infringement]] has occurred. When [[copying]] is (1) [[authorized]] by the [[copyright owner]], (2) exempt from liability as a [[fair use]], (3) otherwise exempt under the provisions of Sections 108-19 or Chapter 10 of the [[1976 Copyright Act|Copyright Act]], or (4) of such a small amount as to be [[de minimis]], then there is no [[copyright infringement|infringement]] liability.</ref>
 
* When a [[work]] is placed into a [[computer]], whether on a [[disk]], [[diskette]], [[ROM]], or other storage device or in [[RAM]] for more than a very brief period, a [[copy]] is made.<ref>''See, e.g.,'' [[MAI v. Peak|MAI Sys.,]] 991 F.2d at 519.</ref>
 
* When a [[work]] is placed into a [[computer]], whether on a [[disk]], [[diskette]], [[ROM]], or other storage device or in [[RAM]] for more than a very brief period, a [[copy]] is made.<ref>''See, e.g.,'' [[MAI v. Peak|MAI Sys.,]] 991 F.2d at 519.</ref>
* When a printed [[work]] is "scanned" into a [[digital file]], a [[copy]] &mdash; the [[digital file]] itself &mdash; is made.
+
* When a printed [[work]] is "[[scan]]ned" into a [[digital file]], a [[copy]] &mdash; the [[digital file]] itself &mdash; is made.
* When other [[work]]s &mdash; including photographs, [[motion pictures]], or [[sound recording]]s &mdash; are [[digitized]], [[copies]] are made.
+
* When other [[work]]s &mdash; including [[photograph]]s, [[motion pictures]], or [[sound recording]]s &mdash; are [[digitized]], [[copies]] are made.
 
* Whenever a [[digitized file]] is [[upload]]ed from a [[user]]'s [[computer]] to a [[website]] or other [[server]], a [[copy]] is made.
 
* Whenever a [[digitized file]] is [[upload]]ed from a [[user]]'s [[computer]] to a [[website]] or other [[server]], a [[copy]] is made.
 
* Whenever a [[digitized file]] is [[download]]ed from a [[website]] or other [[server]], a [[copy]] is made.
 
* Whenever a [[digitized file]] is [[download]]ed from a [[website]] or other [[server]], a [[copy]] is made.
* When a musician [[sample]]s several notes from a previously-recorded song.
+
* When a musician [[sample]]s several notes from a previously-[[recorded]] [[song]].
* When a [[computer]] is used to [[rip]] an audio track into [[MP3 format]] or making a bit-for-bit [[copy]] of a movie on [[DVD]].
+
* When a [[computer]] is used to [[rip]] an [[audio track]] into [[MP3 format]] or making a [[bit-for-bit copy]] of a movie on [[DVD]].
* When a file is transferred from one [[computer network]] [[user]] to another, multiple [[copies]] generally are made.<ref>For example, if an [[author]] transfers a file (such as a manuscript) to a publisher with an [[Internet]] account, [[copies]] will typically, at a minimum, be made (a) in the [[author]]'s [[Internet server]], (b) in the publisher's [[Internet server]], (c) in the publisher's [[local area network]] [[server]], and (d) in the editor's [[computer]]. It has been suggested that such "[[copying]]" of files in intermediate [[server]]s is only of [[transitory duration]] and consequently not covered by the reproduction right. However, it is clear that if the "[[copy]]" exists for more than a period of [[transitory duration]], the reproduction right is implicated. Whether such reproduction is an [[copyright infringement|infringement]] would be a separate determination.</ref>
+
* When a [[file]] is [[transfer]]red from one [[computer network]] [[user]] to another, multiple [[copies]] generally are made.<ref>For example, if an [[author]] transfers a [[file]] (such as a manuscript) to a publisher with an [[Internet]] account, [[copies]] will typically, at a minimum, be made (a) in the [[author]]'s [[Internet server]], (b) in the publisher's [[Internet server]], (c) in the publisher's [[local area network]] [[server]], and (d) in the editor's [[computer]]. It has been suggested that such "[[copying]]" of files in intermediate [[server]]s is only of [[transitory duration]] and consequently not covered by the reproduction right. However, it is clear that if the "[[copy]]" exists for more than a period of [[transitory duration]], the reproduction right is implicated. Whether such reproduction is an [[copyright infringement|infringement]] would be a separate determination.</ref>
   
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references />
 
<references />
 
 
[[Category:Copyright]]
 
[[Category:Copyright]]
 
[[Category:Legislation]]
 
[[Category:Legislation]]

Latest revision as of 03:12, 2 November 2017

Definition[]

To reproduce (also duplicate) means to make a copy.

U.S. copyright law[]

The fundamental right to reproduce copyrighted works in copies and phonorecords[1] is implicated in innumerable online transactions. Indeed, because of the nature of computer-to-computer communications, reproduction is implicated in most online transactions. For example, when a computer user accesses a document resident on another computer, the image on the user's screen exists only by virtue of the copy that is reproduced in the user's computer memory. It has long been clear under U.S. law that the placement of copyrighted material into a computer's memory is a reproduction of that material (because the work in memory then may be, in the law's terms, "perceived, reproduced, or . . . communicated . . . with the aid of a machine or device").[2]

The 1976 Copyright Act, its legislative history, the CONTU Final Report, and repeated holdings by courts make it clear that in each of the instances set out below, one or more copies is made.[3]

References[]

  1. 17 U.S.C. §101.
  2. In 1978, the CONTU Final Report noted, "[T]he application of principles already embodied in the language of the [current] copyright law achieves the desired substantive legal protection for copyrighted works which exist in machine-readable form. The introduction of a work into a computer memory would, consistent with the [current] law, be a reproduction of the work, one of the exclusive rights of the copyright proprietor." CONTU Final Report, at 40. See also MAI Sys. Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc., 991 F.2d 511, 519 (9th Cir. 1993) (full-text), cert. dism., 510 U.S. 1033 (1994).; Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd., 847 F.2d 255, 260 (5th Cir. 1988) (full-text); Advanced Computer Servs. v. MAI Sys. Corp., 845 F. Supp. 356 (E.D. Va. 1994) (full-text); Triad Sys. Corp. v. Southeastern Express Co., 64 F.3d 1330 (9th Cir. 1995) (full-text).
  3. That copying has occurred does not necessarily mean that infringement has occurred. When copying is (1) authorized by the copyright owner, (2) exempt from liability as a fair use, (3) otherwise exempt under the provisions of Sections 108-19 or Chapter 10 of the Copyright Act, or (4) of such a small amount as to be de minimis, then there is no infringement liability.
  4. See, e.g., MAI Sys., 991 F.2d at 519.
  5. For example, if an author transfers a file (such as a manuscript) to a publisher with an Internet account, copies will typically, at a minimum, be made (a) in the author's Internet server, (b) in the publisher's Internet server, (c) in the publisher's local area network server, and (d) in the editor's computer. It has been suggested that such "copying" of files in intermediate servers is only of transitory duration and consequently not covered by the reproduction right. However, it is clear that if the "copy" exists for more than a period of transitory duration, the reproduction right is implicated. Whether such reproduction is an infringement would be a separate determination.