No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{stub}} |
||
| − | |||
| − | |||
The '''unclean hands''' doctrine may apply when the alleged misconduct occurs in a transaction directly related to the matter before the court and the conduct affects the equitable relationship between the litigants.<ref>Newman v. Checkrite Cal., Inc., 912 F. Supp. 1354, 1376 (E.D. Cal. 1995)([http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6587395543086933039&q=912+F.+Supp.+1354&hl=en&as_sdt=2002 full-text]).</ref> |
The '''unclean hands''' doctrine may apply when the alleged misconduct occurs in a transaction directly related to the matter before the court and the conduct affects the equitable relationship between the litigants.<ref>Newman v. Checkrite Cal., Inc., 912 F. Supp. 1354, 1376 (E.D. Cal. 1995)([http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6587395543086933039&q=912+F.+Supp.+1354&hl=en&as_sdt=2002 full-text]).</ref> |
||
Revision as of 06:16, 15 April 2010
The unclean hands doctrine may apply when the alleged misconduct occurs in a transaction directly related to the matter before the court and the conduct affects the equitable relationship between the litigants.[1]